MA Can Continue to Lead on Gun Violence Prevention

By Becca Kornet, Progressive Mass Western Norfolk County

Progressive Mass Western Norfolk County and the Medfield Democratic Town Committee co-hosted a virtual event on November 9 focused on gun violence. Rina Schneur from Moms Demand Action Massachusetts highlighted key statistics about gun violence, discussed the work that Moms does, and explained the omnibus gun violence bill recently passed by the State House (H.4139).

Moms Demand Action is an organization that advocates for gun safety laws, supports survivors and local partners, educates the public about secure gun storage, and supports candidates who will be champions for gun violence prevention.

Here are a few of the striking statistics she highlighted:

  • Every day, 120 Americans are killed with guns (up from 100 a day just a few years ago).
  • Firearms are the #1 leading cause of death for American children and teens.
  • While mass shootings are horrific and often motivate people to volunteer and take action, they actually represent <.5% of all gun deaths – the majority of gun deaths are suicides.
  • The gun death rate in the US is 20 times higher than that of other high-income countries.
Firearms are the #1 leading cause of death for American children and teens.
59% of gun deaths (2016-2020) were suicides
The gun death rate in the US is 20 times higher than that of other high income countries.

On October 18, the MA House voted 120 to 38 to pass H.4139: An Act Modernizing Gun Laws. Of Medfield’s two state representatives, Denise Garlick voted for the bill, and Marcus Vaughn voted against it.

Here’s what the bill would do:

  • Strengthen the process for and training associated with obtaining a license to carry a firearm
  • Ensure consistency in all forms of orders of protection and expands categories of people eligible to petition for protection
  • Rein in ghost guns by requiring firearm serialization and requiring the Department of Criminal Justice Information to collect and publish relevant data
  • Require all firearms sold in MA to be sold with locks or safety devices
  • Establish a commission to study the funding structure for violence prevention services and a commission to study and report microstamping and personalized handgun technology
  • Prohibit firearms in sensitive places (e.g., schools)
  • Raise the age of possessing a semi-automatic long gun to 21

The Massachusetts State Senate is working on its own bill, and we expect action by January. Please text MA to 64433 to contact your State Senator and urge them to take action.

Progressive Watertown Hosts Polluters Pay Forum

Prog-Watertown-Polluters-Pay1

By Eileen Ryan, Progressive Watertown

On Sunday, October 22, Progressive Watertown and Watertown Citizens for Peace Justice and the Environment co-hosted an educational forum at the Watertown Public Library about the current Massachusetts Make Polluters Pay bill. The panel discussion was moderated by Watertown resident Connie Henry and included Laurel Schwab, Watertown Senior Environmental Planner, Dan Zackin, 350MA Legislative Coordinator, and Steve Owens, State Representative for the 29th Middlesex District. 

“Make Polluters Pay” is the informal name for An Act Establishing a Climate Change Superfund Promoting Polluter Responsibility, Bill H. 872/S.481. Similar bills are currently in front of the legislatures of Vermont, Maryland, and New York. Make Polluters Pay will provide Massachusetts communities with funds from the largest emitters of greenhouse gases to address the effects of the climate crisis. The funds will be used for resiliency and adaptation projects such as geo-thermal grids, flood mitigation, and the reduction of heat islands. 

Laurel Schwab spoke about the possible use of the funds in Watertown and other Massachusetts cities and towns.

Dan Zackin spoke about broadening the coalition of groups supporting Make Polluters Pay, to include labor unions and environmental justice communities as well as environmental groups. SEIU is already a supporter. 350MA is one of several organizations actively working to educate the public and legislators about the importance of Make Polluters Pay. 

State Rep. Steve Owens who is a co-sponsor of the bill with Senator Jamie Eldridge, spoke about why this bill is important and how it differs from a lawsuit. 

There was a small but well-informed audience that asked thoughtful questions and included three current Watertown City Councilors, one previous counselor, and a candidate for school committee.

Want to find out if your legislators are already supporters? Check out our Scorecard page here.

Elizabeth Warren is Keeping Up the Fight: Notes from Her Town Hall in Needham

by Jan Soma, Progressive Needham

Senator Elizabeth Warren and Jan Soma of Progressive Needham.
Senator Elizabeth Warren and Jan Soma of Progressive Needham.

There was a crowd that overflowed the large hall, and the energy resonated. Murmurs, clapping, shouts — it was clear that the audience was excited to be there.

Where were they? The applause was coming from people who, like me, attended Elizabeth Warren’s Town Hall in Needham on August 30th and were excited about the work that our senator has been doing in Washington.

The central takeaway from the town hall? Warren is determined to help save our democracy. She believes we need 4 more justices on the U.S. Supreme Court. To get there, she is supporting key Democrats who are facing opposition for the next election and told the crowd that they needed to help keep the Senate and flip the House in 2024. 

I asked a question about federal support for child care. Federal funding for the stabilization of child care is due to mostly run out on Sept. 30th of this year. I wanted to know if she thought that a new bill called the Child Care Stabilization Act might pass to keep as many as 70,000 child care programs across the country from shutting down. The short answer: she doesn’t think the Republicans will join Democrats to keep these programs operating. Millions of children are probably going to be without needed care this fall as a result. She vowed to keep pushing for a federal program that supports families. I mentioned the Massachusetts Common Start initiatives that promise to bridge the child care funding gap in our state as the federal funds dry up. Of course she is a fan!

When asked about her view of term limits, Senator Warren said she was not a supporter. She believes power is developed over time and good leaders would be forced to leave before they had time to accomplish the goals their constituents valued. She also stated that our elected officials in Washington need more money for staffing. While laughing, she recounted a time when another legislator mentioned to her that cryptocurrency sounded wonderful. This legislator was visited by convincing crypto lobbyists but didn’t have enough staff to research it within their own office. She said she needs more staff funding to expand her work in the Senate.

Some short takes: 

  • She supports Security and Exchange Commissioner Gary Gensler’s goal of having new private equity disclosure rules. She said that as many as 1 in 2 homes have been purchased with cash recently by private equity groups who held them back until the market was high and then unloaded them. This drives the housing market up and out of reach for many. She wants the Federal Government to contribute more money to bring home prices lower and increase supply.
  • Senator Warren wants to ‘take on some of the structures which would be unpopular politically’ to create a more equitable healthcare system. For now, she is focused on decreasing the cost of drugs and managing private Medicare Advantage vendors who are ‘up-diagnosing’ to receive many millions of dollars of unfair higher payments from the Medicare program. 
  • When a concern over credit card practices was raised, Senator Warren encouraged anyone with a problem to register a complaint with the Federal Consumer Protection Agency. She said it is easy to register a complaint and that it is useful to the agency because they learn where problems are when they see clusters of complaints.

Would you like to get involved with Progressive Needham? You can email them here!

Lowell Stands for Democracy in Cambodia

by Marissa Dupont, Solidarity Lowell

Lowell has the second-largest Cambodian population in the United States (after Long Beach, CA). But this population is not a monolith. There is a divide between those who stand behind the regime of Hun Sen (the Cambodian People’s Party, or CPP), and those who are fighting for democracy in Cambodia (the Cambodia National Rescue Party, or CNRP).

At the City Council meeting earlier this week, our ceremonial mayor, Sokhary Chau, submitted two motions to the Council, bundled as one, to establish Sister-City agreements between Lowell and the cities of Phnom Penh and Battambang in Cambodia. Chau is viewed by many in Lowell’s Cambodian population as overly sympathetic toward the CPP and the Cambodian regime despite its repeated human rights abuses, and such Sister City agreements would be a boon to the regime’s public relations efforts. 

The excitement began as soon as a Councilor requested to have this motion moved up in the agenda. Immediately, Councilor Paul Ratha Yem, who was listed as one of the members who submitted the motion, announced that he was rescinding his support. He stated that he had been unaware of the message that supporting this would send, and that after speaking with many community members had decided that this was the wrong decision.

This motion brought out many important members of the Cambodian community in America–including two former members of the Cambodian Parliament, who traveled from Maryland and Rhode Island, respectively–as well as many supporters (both Cambodian and otherwise). Every chair was filled. The mezzanine level was packed. Cheers erupted as soon as Yem finished speaking, and many waved signs bearing slogans in Khmer.

After the applause died down, Mayor Chau asked the Councilors if anyone else would second the motion. He was met with silence. He then announced that both motions failed and that we would be moving on in the agenda. But Councilor Vesna Nuon (who is also Cambodian) interrupted and politely asked that since all of these people showed up, that we should still hear what they had to say. (More applause.) 

The first speaker, Bopha Peou, was very emotional and said that her father died in Cambodia, and she and her family fled here to escape the violence. She requested the motion never be brought up again as long as the dictatorial government was still in power. (Rousing applause)

Next was Susie Chhoun, a prominent member of the CNRP and member of the Lowell School Committee. The motions, she said, “are designed to camouflage a range of human rights abuses which take place under a veneer of normality in Cambodia.” She continued, “Phnom Pen is a city where critics of government have been killed notoriously in broad daylight with complete impunity.” She listed lakes that had been filled for property development, and “thousands of poor families left landless and homeless after violent and forced evictions.” She said that in the United States, “Cambodians are still being watched by the regime, including myself. Many are afraid to criticize the government, even in private conversations because they know that their families and business interests in Cambodia are at risk.” She was met with loud applause.

Rithy Uong spoke next. He is also a prominent member of the CNRP and made history as the first person of color elected to the Lowell City Council in 1999, where he served until 2005. In his speech, he reminded the Council of his past there, and listed a number of harrowing statistics about Cambodia. As he concluded, he said, “I myself am a survivor of the killing fields. I understand that I am here because I seek for the country that provides me freedom and democracy.” Then he looked to the balcony and loudly asked, “What do you want?” Many yelled in reply, “Democracy!”

Young up-and-coming politician Tara Hong followed Rithy. He is a board member of the Cambodian Mutual Assistance Association in Lowell, and challenged State Representative Rady Mom for his seat last year. “We have a government [in Cambodia] that arrests and silences people and dissolves political parties who speak up and push for change in the system.” He stated that if the motion had passed, we would be saying that what’s happening in Cambodia right now is okay, and went on to say that the UN, our State Senator Ed Kennedy, and State Representative Vanna Howard have all called for free and fair elections in Cambodia. “I am deeply, deeply disappointed to see our first Cambodian-American mayor would even bring this up.”

Solidarity Lowell member Dee Halzack was next at the podium. “As an American, I believe that any threat to democracy needs to be stood up against. One of the best ways we can stand up against it in other countries is to not pretend to be friends or act as if we’re friends with a repressive government.” The audience clapped. “I would also tell you that we should be leery of being friends with a country that is friends with China.”

Eng Chhai Eang, Vice President of the CNRP and a former member of Cambodian Parliament spoke next in Khmer; with Mu Sochua, Second Vice President of the CNRP and also a former member of Cambodian Parliament, interpreting into English. Eang stated that he was the Chair of the Parliamentary Commission on Human Rights in Cambodia. “I lost my seat because the Hun Sen government took it away.” He pointed out that Lowell City Councilors are elected by the people, and explained that in Cambodia, mayors are appointed by Hun Sen only to serve his interests. He said that were we to create a Sister City agreement with any city in Cambodia, we would be working for the Hun Sen regime.

In the middle of Eang’s speech, Mayor Chau interrupted him, accusing him of going over the five-minute time limit–even though he would not have if his speech were not being translated. up, despite the fact that were he not being translated, his speech would not have gone over the five minute limit. Eang kept speaking. Chau repeated what he said in Khmer. Eang kept speaking. Then Ron Peacetree (a Solidarity Lowell member) stood up in the back and yelled “He can have my time!” and Eang was able to finish his speech.

Solidarity Lowell member Joe Boyle followed Eang. “You would have been all over Cambodian state media, helping to disarm the Cambodian opposition,” Joe said while looking at Chau, “but, because of the actions taken by this body tonight, you won’t.”

Yun-Ju Choi, Executive Director of Coalition for a Better Acre, spoke next. She described traveling to Cambodia as part of a delegation with City Councilor Rita Mercier and then-City Councilor Rodney Elliot in 2015. She explained that back then she was new to Lowell and excited to learn about the culture here, but had no understanding of Cambodian politics. She went on to say that while in Cambodia she learned about what kind of government it has, and had a lot of regret for going on that trip. 

Another up-and-coming young politician, Justin Ford, who ran for City Council two years ago, continued the speeches. He explained how his father and other family members came to America to escape the killing fields and create a better life for themselves. “Mr. Mayor, … You should know the significance behind that motion. Say no to dictators!” (Cheers)

I was next. My speech was short, so I’ll copy it here: “Hun Sen is a brutal dictator who is attempting to destroy democracy in Cambodia. Many of Lowell’s Cambodian citizens have relatives who still live there, who are trapped and unable to speak freely. This motion only legitimizes that dictatorship. We cannot forge a friendship with any cities in Cambodia while Hun Sen is in power. Solidarity Lowell stands with the CNRP in their fight for democracy in Cambodia.”

There were no more speakers from the community, so at this point they moved on to hear the thoughts of the City Council members. 

Councilor Rita Mercier, the longest-serving member of the Council, kicked things off, with a defensive explanation of why she had gone to Cambodia with Yun-Ju Choi. She said she went to experience what her constituents feel, and see what they had experienced. She was not sorry for going because of all that she had learned. “We went to the refugee camps in Thailand, we went to Angkor Wat, we went to see a beautiful structure, wonder of the world…” she rambled. “I wouldn’t even want to tell you what I’ve been through, learning this,” she said of her trip, to actual victims of the killing fields. “The things that they did to the woman were just so atrocious that I think of it every now and then and it gives me the chills,” she said, to people who deal with these memories every day.

She went on to explain that she and the rest of the group from Lowell visited a prison where 13 women were unjustly locked up for wanting to keep their land when the government wanted to give it away. She said that when she returned to Lowell, she met with then-Congresswoman Nikki Tsongas, and Elliot met with Senator Elizabeth Warren, and they in turn met with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and in two weeks the women were released. 

Councilor Kim Scott spoke up next and suggested that the Council review the criteria that we use to create Sister Cities.

Councilor Vesna Nuon was next to speak on this motion. He recognized the many Cambodians who had lost loved ones to the Khmer Rouge. “I am really almost in tears myself when Bopha Peou spoke. I know she had that feeling and most of the people in this room too. It’s been 40-something years and that doesn’t go away. … Someday we will have a Sister City arrangement with Cambodia when they have a leader that do[es] respect human rights, free and fair elections, and the rule of law.”

Councilor Erik Gitschier followed with a speech straight out of middle school, starting with the dictionary definition of the word “democracy.” He thanked everyone who reached out to him and said that he learned a lot. He thanked the mayor for withdrawing the motion, but said, “I don’t know that we would have known any better had it not been put forward.” (Despite him having many Cambodians in his district.) “I learned a lot about Cambodia. Whether it’s true or not, I don’t have that background,” he added — a baffling statement. 

Councilor Corey Robinson went next, pointing out that normally when a Sister City is proposed, the people of that heritage are proud and excited. But that was not the case in this situation, and this motion was not fair for the residents of the city.

Councilor Wayne Jenness said that unlike any other motion he’s seen, every message he heard about this was unanimous. He made the motion then to request that the Rules Subcommittee meet to create policies around the Sister Cities relationships going forward. A voice vote was then taken and the motion carried.

Finally, Mayor Chau himself announced that he’d like to say a few words. “When I made the Sister City motion, it was intended to be good for Battambang and Lowell, not for politics or the government.” He pointed out that we already have Sister City agreements with many other cities, including Liberia and Russia. He claimed that in creating those relationships, none of the Councilors had thought about the political parties of the government or country. At the end of his speech, he spoke about the many amazing qualities of Battambang in a way that seemed straight out of a tourist brochure. He ended with, “Battambang has many delicious foods and fruit.” 

Boos echoed through the chamber.

Progressive Mass Western Norfolk County Celebrates Impressive Wins in Purple District

Progressive Massachusetts Western Norfolk County, in partnership with Young Democrats of Neponset Valley, celebrated last year’s election results on March 28, 2023.  A crowd of over 60 people attended the celebration at 7th Wave Brewery in Medfield, including State Senator Becca Rausch, State Representative Jeff Roy, and State Representative Ted Phillips.  The two 2022 candidates for State Representative, 9th Norfolk District–Kevin Kalkut and Steve Teehan–also attended.

Senator Rausch spoke about affordable health care, affordable child care, and the power of the ballot box,  while Representative Jeff Roy spoke about environmental justice and green energy.  The chapter also recognized the efforts of Justin Bates and Bonnie Taylor. Justin served as Becca Rausch’s 2022 Campaign Manager, where Becca received an impressive 55% of the vote. Bonnie was Campaign Manager for Kevin Kalkut, who came within 360 votes of flipping the 9th Norfolk District to the Democrats for the first time in over 30 years.

7th Wave Brewery is committed to brewing great craft beer with local ingredients, reducing their footprint, and giving back to their community. Their massive 500-kilowatt solar array provides 200% of the brewery’s electric needs, putting them at the forefront of sustainable breweries and supporting the local clean energy economy. 

Progressive Massachusetts Western Norfolk County was established in March of 2022 and is committed to the mission of Progressive Massachusetts.  Their 2023 priorities include:

  • Focusing on progressive legislation on Beacon Hill and lobbying members of the House and Senate for their support.
  • Providing residents of Franklin, Medfield, Norfolk, Plainville and Wrentham with information that progressives need to know and a venue to learn about legislative activity on Beacon Hill.
  • Developing a strong group of political activists who will be positioned to have an impact in the 2024 election cycle and beyond.

Contact PM Western Norfolk County, here. Follow them on Facebook, here.

Progressive Newton Joins Educators to Urge a YES Vote on Upcoming Overrides

Activists urging a YES vote for an upcoming override

By Andrew Steinberg, Progressive Newton

On February 14th and 15th, Progressive Newton co-organized standouts with the “Yes for Newton” campaign and Newton Teachers Association to support the three Override votes on Tuesday, March 14th. During the standouts, hundreds of volunteers at 21 schools showed solidarity with Newton educators and community members who recognized the importance of “Yes” votes for the special election. 

The first “operating override” would raise $9.175 million, approximately half of which would go to the Newton Public Schools to help cover staffing and operating costs. The other half would go towards street and sidewalk improvements, park/playground maintenance, programming for senior residents, and climate resiliency projects such as electrifying school buildings and bolstering the city’s tree canopy. The second and third “debt exclusion overrides” would raise $3.5 million and $2.3 million to replace the Countryside Elementary School and the Franklin Elementary School respectively. Both of these schools are overdue for changes. For example, the Countryside School is infamously built so low on wetlands that a learning area in the basement chronically floods and smells like sewage. The state government has recognized the facility as one of the worst in the Commonwealth, and has promised to pay for 25-30% of the costs if Newton funds the rest. 

The Override votes are happening during a special election because a Massachusetts law enacted in 1980 strictly limits the amount of property tax revenue a community can raise. Under state law, the maximum amount a community can levy in any given year is called the “levy limit.” Currently, a community’s levy limit increases automatically by an incremental amount of 2.5% of the prior year’s levy limit. However, by passing an Override, a community can assess taxes in excess of the automatic annual 2.5% increase. Voters must approve this increase above 2.5%.

Historically, cities like Newton have relied on Overrides to raise money for large capital projects. In 2013, the city passed its last Override to rebuild the Angier, Cabot, and Zervas Elementary Schools. Over the last decade, costs for the city have increased due to rising prices of construction materials, equipment, healthcare, transportation, and labor. These prices have shot up even more over the last two years due to inflation. Additionally, new municipal services such as full-day kindergarten, increased mental health supports in schools, and necessary technological infrastructure for students have increased costs. Given that these expenditures would be continuous and the city does not merely want to force the bill on future generations through taking on debt, an Override is the best way to ensure that the funding is both adequate and consistent. 

While the benefits of the Override votes are clear (such as better educational facilities with robust services, and a more sustainable city with greater amenities), the costs of not supporting them are also. According to the Mayor, “without the override, [Newton Public Schools (NPS)] is looking at a potential shortfall of $6 to $8 million which will require extensive reductions to educational services and infrastructure” (“Mayor’s Update,” Jan. 24, 2023). NPS leadership asserts that if the three questions did not pass, the city would have to eliminate 40 to 50 educator positions, resulting in larger class sizes from kindergarten through 12th grade. Elective options would also decrease, and many academic/social/emotional support roles for students and athletic/music/theater programs would be cut. 

Progressive Newton believes that now is not the time for holding back on education funding and reducing school services. The pandemic showed us that the previous system was not enough, and the disparities that the crisis exacerbated will have major consequences for years to come. For this reason, we are proud to support the Newton Teachers Association to advocate for the excellence that our students deserve. Until the 14th, we will be informing our neighbors about the importance of the Override votes and the opportunity to build a better Newton than the one we had before. 

Flyer for the "Show Love for our Schools!" standouts
Activists holding signs for Yes for Newton
Activists holding signs for Yes for Newton
Pictures from the Oak Hill/Brown Middle School standout, organized by Progressive Newton volunteers

Solidarity Lowell February Meeting w/ Special Guest Alexandra Chandler

Solidarity Lowell welcomes Alexandra Chandler to our monthly meeting on the election crisis of 2022.

Sunday, February 27, 5:30pm, Zoom

The risk of election crisis in 2022 and 2024 is high and rising. A large percentage of voters believe that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen, dozens of state-level bills have passed that will facilitate partisan interference in election results, and a campaign of threats and intimidation is driving an exodus of experienced election officials.

In this talk, Alexandra Chandler (former Congressional candidate, now working at Protect Democracy) will outline the core threats to U.S. elections and the potential for election subversion, how these threats and changes in voting access increase the risk level and change the playing field, but also why there is cause for hope and what folks can do to take action to reduce the risk of election crisis and other dangers to our democracy in 2022, 2024, and beyond.

Email us at contact@solidaritylowell.com to find out how to join the meeting.

Neponset Valley Progressives: Labor 22 Recap

By John Kyriakis, Neponset Valley Progressives

On January 25th, local Democratic town committees in Dedham, Norwood, Westwood, and Walpole joined to present “Labor 2022” an event designed to bring attention to the needs of our allies in the labor movement.

An inspiring keynote address from Massachusetts AFL-CIO president Steven Tolman was followed by a panel discussion between Dedham DTC Chair Mark Reilly and labor leaders Max German (AFL-CIO), Gabriel Camacho (UFCW), FayeRuth Fisher (SEIU), and Paul McClory (MTA). The panelists presented several key steps where progressives could take action.

1) Of key importance is the defeat of the so-called gig worker ballot initiative. This ballot question seeks to define Lyft, Uber, Instacart, and Door Dash employees as “contractors” rather than traditional employees. This would deny these low wage, front line workers OSHA protection and unemployment insurance. It would also authorize a sub-minimum wage for these workers, and would eliminate most anti-discrimination protections for workers. The initiative would also indemnify tech companies from litigation if the drivers are in an accident (for more information see here and here). The key components of this initiative are in violation of Massachusetts labor laws, and the initiative is already the subject of a lawsuit by Attorney General Maura Healey.  

The initiative has gained enough signatures to be turned over to the Legislature who have to either take no action, or enact a legislative “solution” that addresses the issues raised by the initiative. Of note, Lyft made the single largest campaign donation ($14.4 million) to the Massachusetts legislature in support of the imitative. If the legislature takes no action, then the well-heeled supporters must obtain an additional 13,374 petition signatures to put the initiative on the November ballot.

Please urge your state Reps and Senators to take no action on this egregious initiativeAfter that we must work to prevent the initiative from garnering the additional signatures it needs. If the measure ends up on the ballot, we must work to defeat it. Tell your friends and family that if this initiative fails, Uber, Lyft, etc. will still be there for them (albeit with unhappy rich shareholders). Also let them know that the crumbs being offered to workers as part of the initiative (a base wage, and a healthcare stipend) are not offered to all workers and are far from sufficient.  Counter corporate lies with truth

2) It is important that we keep up our efforts to enact the Fair Share Amendment.  Check out here to see how you can get involved.


3) Several bills pending in the statehouse also deserve our support.  These bills are due to be reported out of committee for floor votes (or killed) on February 2. Immediate action is needed.

  • S1179/H1959, An Act to Prevent Wage Theft and Promote Employer Accountability.  Contact your state Reps and Senators and urge support.
  • S69/H3710, An Act Facilitating the Unionization of the Cannabis Workforce.  Contact your local legislators and urge support. Also, contact Sen. Sonia Chang-Diaz and Rep Daniel Donahue, committee chairs overseeing the movement of this bill to the floor and urge them to report this bill out of committee.

Sunday, 11/7: Our Democracy Under Siege: How do we rebuild a better and more just Democracy?

Our Democracy Under Siege: How do we rebuild a better and more just Democracy?

As we recover from the carnage that Trump has inflicted on our democracy, it is time for reflection in order to understand what damage has been done, what threats are still facing us, and how we can effectively address the fallout from Trump’s Presidency. We will explore issues such as what work still needs to be done to address low voter turnout, how to create enthusiasm for our government, and how to effectively fight the cynicism that many Americans feel towards our democracy. As we look to the future, how do we create a sense of “We the People” as racism, xenophobia, and numerous inequities and injustices result in pessimism in the American populace.

Join Progressive Watertown on Sunday, November 7, at 2 pm for a discussion. RSVP here!