“Prisons as they are currently structured do not make us safer–they make us less safe.”

No New Womens Prison

By Caroline Bays, a member of the PM Board, PM Issues Committee, and Progressive Watertown

Thank you, Mr Chairman and all of you, for hearing my testimony today on S.1979 / H.1795, an act that would establish a five-year moratorium on building new prisons. 

I am usually before you as a Watertown city councilor or as a board member on behalf of Progressive Massachusetts. But today I  am here on behalf of my dear friend who has spent the last 16 of his 35 years in prison. 

Six years ago, I had a life-changing event when I was asked to visit this young man who was experiencing a mental health crisis. As a result, I have seen up close how dysfunctional, counter-productive, and destructive prisons are to the human beings who live within those walls. 

Prisons no longer even pay lip service to rehabilitation; they are designed purely for punishment. They no longer try to help people get back on their feet and become productive members of our society. The stories I have heard–the danger, harm, cruelty, and viciousness he has experienced are destructive not just to him but to our society and who we are as a state. 

Prisons as they are currently structured do not make us safer–they make us less safe. And we are harming the most vulnerable members of our society–people who need help. We are putting people who are mentally ill in prison; we are putting people who are addicted to drugs in prison; we are putting people who are experiencing dire poverty in prison. 

Since when did we decide that it was morally right to treat those who need our help as criminals and deny them the support and treatment they need? Whom does it help? This is cruel to those impacted and actually decreases our safety. 

I urge you to help us look for solutions that will benefit everyone–the incarcerated people and the general public.

Solidarity Lowell Featured in Boston Globe, Lowell Sun

Sean Cotter, “In Lowell, debate over homeless encampment behind park,” Boston Globe, June 25, 2023.

“The protesters, waving signs with messages including “Lowellians Over Luxury” and “Stop The Sweeps,” said they didn’t like how City Hall was handling issues of homelessness. In January, according to the Lowell Sun, the city began an effort to get rid of homeless camps….“They need to treat them like human beings,” Joseph Boyle of Solidarity Lowell said at the encampment Sunday.” (Photo also includes Marissa Dupont and Amy Baranoski!)

Melanie Gilbert, “City plans sweep of homeless camp; unhoused, advocates cry foul,” Lowell Sun, June 25, 2023.

“But Marissa Dupont, of Lowell, and a member of the coordinating committee of Solidarity Lowell, said that although notice was given, the city doesn’t have sufficient beds to rehouse the Dog Park residents.

Solidarity Lowell is a volunteer group of community members of Greater Lowell working toward social justice by defending the human rights, dignity and equality of all persons against all forms of hate and discrimination. They joined members of the group LLAMA, which stands for Lifting Lowellians: Assistance and Mutual Aid, who gathered Sunday morning in nonviolent opposition to the anticipated sweep.

“We want these people to have homes,” Dupont said. “(The city) says, ‘We have four beds’ (in Lowell) but that’s not 23, and there’s no mention of getting them into hotels or anything. They say they are going to get vouchers.””

TUESDAY: Rally & Hearing for the Prison Moratorium

Massachusetts is planning to spend $50 million to build a new women’s prison to replace MCI-Framingham. As of January 1, 2022, the population in MCI-Framingham stood at 179, with more than 20% held in pre-trial detention. In part as a result of sentencing reforms, Massachusetts’s incarceration rate has been falling, which raises the question: Why expand a system that costs $235,000 per person and only causes further harm?

Studies have repeatedly shown that society cannot incarcerate its way to safety, and the family separation of incarceration and the well-documented inhumane conditions in Massachusetts’s prisons and jails fuel the community instability that is detrimental to public safety. Instead, investments in housing, health care, economic opportunity, and other social supports have been shown to be the true foundation of public safety for all.

It’s clear: Massachusetts doesn’t need new prisons, not now and not ever, and the Prison Moratorium bill (H. 1795 / S.1979) is how we can achieve that.

Next Tuesday, the Joint Committee on State Administration and Regulatory Oversight is holding a hearing on the Prison Moratorium bill at 11 am in Gardner Auditorium.

Can you show up on Tuesday and join Families for Justice as Healing for a rally before?

Not able to attend Tuesday’s hearing? You can still make a difference by contacting your state legislators in support.

PM Joins 80 Other Organizations in Calling for Tuition Equity

June 9, 2023

To: Sen. Michael J. Rodrigues, Chair, Senate Committee on Ways and Means

Rep. Aaron M. Michlewitz, Chair, House Committee on Ways and Means

Sen. Cindy F. Friedman, Vice-Chair, Senate Committee on Ways and Means

Rep. Ann-Margaret Ferrante, Vice-Chair, House Committee on Ways and Means

Sen. Patrick O’Connor, Ranking Minority Member, Senate Committee on Ways and Means

Rep. Todd M. Smola, Ranking Minority Member, House Committee on Ways and Means

CC: The Honorable Senate President Karen E. Spilka

The Honorable Speaker of the House Ronald Mariano

FR: The Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy (MIRA) Coalition, the Massachusetts Tuition Equity Coalition (MTEC) and the Undersigned MIRA Coalition Members, Allies, and Partner Organizations

RE: Access to In-State Tuition Rates at Public Colleges and Universities for Immigrant Graduates of Massachusetts High Schools, Regardless of Immigration Status

We, the 81 undersigned immigrant-serving organizations and allies, are grateful to the leadership of the House and Senate for your generous support for legislation and programs providing critical services and assistance for the Commonwealth’s immigrant and refugee communities in recent years. We are especially grateful for legislative advances that address the needs of the most vulnerable members of our Commonwealth’s diverse immigrant communities, such as last year’s historic passage of the Work and Family Mobility Act.

As you finalize the FY24 budget this year, we respectfully request that the conference committee extend in-state tuition and state-funded education assistance to eligible Massachusetts high school graduates, regardless of their immigration status, as provided in outside section 8 of the Senate budget.

Immigrant advocates and higher education leaders in Massachusetts have long supported broad access to an affordable public college education for immigrant youth, particularly those without status who arrived in the U.S. as children and have been educated in our public schools. Currently these students are required to pay out-of-state or international tuition rates (up to four times the in-state rate). They are overwhelmingly from low-income, hardworking families, often with substantial responsibilities to contribute to family income, but lack access to both federal and state student financial aid. This combination effectively denies some of our most ambitious and talented high school graduates from continuing their education and contributing to the Massachusetts economy.

We support the inclusion of the in-state tuition provision for the following reasons:

Our Commonwealth should continue investing in these students. There are an estimated 15,000 undocumented students currently enrolled in Massachusetts primary schools. Massachusetts should make good on this investment by allowing these students to fulfill their educational potential.

Expanded access to public higher education is an investment in the future Massachusetts workforce. In Massachusetts, immigrants are 80 percent more likely than US-born residents to start their own businesses, ranging from family-owned small businesses to tech startups. Nearly one in four entrepreneurs in Massachusetts is foreign-born.

Our public colleges and universities would benefit from broadening educational access to include these students, given declining Massachusetts enrollment rates. Foreign-born students account for a substantial portion of the public college and university student body. Nationally, 83% of immigrant college students were enrolled in public institutions (as opposed to private ones) in 2018. Meanwhile, college enrollment in Massachusetts has declined by over 10% since 2015.

We believe that Massachusetts has a historic opportunity to join the over 23 states that have expanded public higher educational opportunities to undocumented high school graduates, and continue this legislature’s legacy of support for our immigrant communities. The proposed policy would benefit our public higher education institutions, our labor force, and most importantly, the Massachusetts high school graduates who are educated, work, and pay taxes here in our Commonwealth.

Respectfully,

Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition

Massachusetts Tuition Equity Coalition

32BJ SEIU

ACLU of Massachusetts

Action for Boston Community Development, Inc. (ABCD)

ADL New England

African Bridge Network

Agencia ALPHA

American Federation of Teachers Massachusetts

Amplify Latinx

Asian American Resource Workshop (AARW)

Asian Task Force Against Domestic Violence (ATASK)

Berkshire Immigrant Center

Boston Chinatown Neighborhood Center

Boston City Councilor At-Large Ruthzee Louijeune

Boston Immigrant Justice Accompaniment Network

Boston Teachers Union

Brazilian Women’s Group

Brazilian Worker Center

Brockton Workers Alliance

Cape Cod Coalition for Safe Communities

Central West Justice Center

Centro Presente

Children’s Law Center of Massachusetts

Citizens for Public Schools

Coalition for a Better Acre

Coalition for Safe Communities

Community Action Agency of Somerville, Inc.

Community Economic Development Center New Bedford

Dominican Development Center/ Boston Immigrant Worker Center

East Boston Community Council

East Boston Neighborhood Health Center

Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program

Harvard Representation Initiative

Health Law Advocates

Hildreth Institute

Housing = Health

Immigrant Family Services Institute (IFSI-USA)

Immigrants’ Assistance Center, Inc. (IAC)

International Institute of New England

Jewish Alliance for Law and Social Action

Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston

League of Women Voters of Marblehead

League of Women Voters of Massachusetts

MAPA Translations, Inc.

Massachusetts Action for Justice

Massachusetts Alliance of Portuguese Speakers (MAPS)

Massachusetts Appleseed Center for Law and Justice

Massachusetts Association of Teachers of Speakers of Other Languages (MATSOL)

Massachusetts Coalition for the Homeless

Massachusetts Education Justice Alliance

Massachusetts Immigrant Collaborative

Massachusetts Law Reform Institute

Massachusetts Teachers Association (MTA)

Maverick Landing Community Services (MLCS)

Mayor Ballantyne, City of Somerville

Mayor’s Office for Immigrant Advancement

Merrimack Valley Project

MetroWest Legal Services

Metrowest Worker Center – Casa

Multicultural Education, Training & Advocacy (META) Inc.

New England Justice for Our Neighbors

Northeast Justice Center

Northeastern University School of Law Immigrant Justice Clinic

Pathway for Immigrant Workers, Inc.

Paulist Center Immigrant Advocacy Group

Progressive Massachusetts

Rian Immigrant Center

Rosie’s Place

Saheli Inc

Sisters of St. Joseph of Boston

Somerville Homeless Coalition, Inc.

Somerville Public Schools

Stories Inspiring Movements (SIM)

Student Clinic for Immigrant Justice

The Welcome Project

TRUE ALLIANCE CENTER INC

uAspire

Unitarian Universalist Mass Action

United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1445

YWCA Central MA

Advocates, Students, and Legislators Demand Comprehensive Sex Ed

By Jan Soma, Progressive Needham

Earlier today, over 200 advocates, legislators, and staffers came together in the Great Hall of the Massachusetts State House to join forces in a spirited rally/lobby event focused on sex education in our schools. 

The Healthy Youth Act — An Act relative to healthy youth (H544/S268) — was first introduced in 2011. It has been passed unanimously by the Senate, but has not been brought to the floor for a vote in the House. 

At the event, lead sponsors Rep. Jim O’Day (D-West Boylston), Rep. Vanna Howard (D-Lowell), and Sen. Sal DiDomenico (D-Everett) spoke of this commonsense bill as vital to the health of our young people. A graduating senior from the Worchester Technical School, Lexis Keys, talked frankly about how we need to do better to educate our young people about sexual health and relationships. Planned Parenthood Vice President of Education, Learning and Engagement Jennifer Hart shared the results of a Guttmacher Institute study that shows Massachusetts as having a sex ed score of zero. Fourteen other states are doing better than we are.

The consensus of the speakers and the audience was that we can and must do better. Of likely voters in Massachusetts, 92% believe that all students have the right to receive sex ed in high school. Sex ed has been shown to reduce bullying and abuse, helps students form healthy relationships and improves their academic performance.

Some hope that having a new governor who is supportive of sexual health education might tip the balance this session. After the rally, advocates fanned out to speak with their legislators to urge their support or to thank them for their ongoing efforts to pass this bill.

Lowell Stands for Democracy in Cambodia

by Marissa Dupont, Solidarity Lowell

Lowell has the second-largest Cambodian population in the United States (after Long Beach, CA). But this population is not a monolith. There is a divide between those who stand behind the regime of Hun Sen (the Cambodian People’s Party, or CPP), and those who are fighting for democracy in Cambodia (the Cambodia National Rescue Party, or CNRP).

At the City Council meeting earlier this week, our ceremonial mayor, Sokhary Chau, submitted two motions to the Council, bundled as one, to establish Sister-City agreements between Lowell and the cities of Phnom Penh and Battambang in Cambodia. Chau is viewed by many in Lowell’s Cambodian population as overly sympathetic toward the CPP and the Cambodian regime despite its repeated human rights abuses, and such Sister City agreements would be a boon to the regime’s public relations efforts. 

The excitement began as soon as a Councilor requested to have this motion moved up in the agenda. Immediately, Councilor Paul Ratha Yem, who was listed as one of the members who submitted the motion, announced that he was rescinding his support. He stated that he had been unaware of the message that supporting this would send, and that after speaking with many community members had decided that this was the wrong decision.

This motion brought out many important members of the Cambodian community in America–including two former members of the Cambodian Parliament, who traveled from Maryland and Rhode Island, respectively–as well as many supporters (both Cambodian and otherwise). Every chair was filled. The mezzanine level was packed. Cheers erupted as soon as Yem finished speaking, and many waved signs bearing slogans in Khmer.

After the applause died down, Mayor Chau asked the Councilors if anyone else would second the motion. He was met with silence. He then announced that both motions failed and that we would be moving on in the agenda. But Councilor Vesna Nuon (who is also Cambodian) interrupted and politely asked that since all of these people showed up, that we should still hear what they had to say. (More applause.) 

The first speaker, Bopha Peou, was very emotional and said that her father died in Cambodia, and she and her family fled here to escape the violence. She requested the motion never be brought up again as long as the dictatorial government was still in power. (Rousing applause)

Next was Susie Chhoun, a prominent member of the CNRP and member of the Lowell School Committee. The motions, she said, “are designed to camouflage a range of human rights abuses which take place under a veneer of normality in Cambodia.” She continued, “Phnom Pen is a city where critics of government have been killed notoriously in broad daylight with complete impunity.” She listed lakes that had been filled for property development, and “thousands of poor families left landless and homeless after violent and forced evictions.” She said that in the United States, “Cambodians are still being watched by the regime, including myself. Many are afraid to criticize the government, even in private conversations because they know that their families and business interests in Cambodia are at risk.” She was met with loud applause.

Rithy Uong spoke next. He is also a prominent member of the CNRP and made history as the first person of color elected to the Lowell City Council in 1999, where he served until 2005. In his speech, he reminded the Council of his past there, and listed a number of harrowing statistics about Cambodia. As he concluded, he said, “I myself am a survivor of the killing fields. I understand that I am here because I seek for the country that provides me freedom and democracy.” Then he looked to the balcony and loudly asked, “What do you want?” Many yelled in reply, “Democracy!”

Young up-and-coming politician Tara Hong followed Rithy. He is a board member of the Cambodian Mutual Assistance Association in Lowell, and challenged State Representative Rady Mom for his seat last year. “We have a government [in Cambodia] that arrests and silences people and dissolves political parties who speak up and push for change in the system.” He stated that if the motion had passed, we would be saying that what’s happening in Cambodia right now is okay, and went on to say that the UN, our State Senator Ed Kennedy, and State Representative Vanna Howard have all called for free and fair elections in Cambodia. “I am deeply, deeply disappointed to see our first Cambodian-American mayor would even bring this up.”

Solidarity Lowell member Dee Halzack was next at the podium. “As an American, I believe that any threat to democracy needs to be stood up against. One of the best ways we can stand up against it in other countries is to not pretend to be friends or act as if we’re friends with a repressive government.” The audience clapped. “I would also tell you that we should be leery of being friends with a country that is friends with China.”

Eng Chhai Eang, Vice President of the CNRP and a former member of Cambodian Parliament spoke next in Khmer; with Mu Sochua, Second Vice President of the CNRP and also a former member of Cambodian Parliament, interpreting into English. Eang stated that he was the Chair of the Parliamentary Commission on Human Rights in Cambodia. “I lost my seat because the Hun Sen government took it away.” He pointed out that Lowell City Councilors are elected by the people, and explained that in Cambodia, mayors are appointed by Hun Sen only to serve his interests. He said that were we to create a Sister City agreement with any city in Cambodia, we would be working for the Hun Sen regime.

In the middle of Eang’s speech, Mayor Chau interrupted him, accusing him of going over the five-minute time limit–even though he would not have if his speech were not being translated. up, despite the fact that were he not being translated, his speech would not have gone over the five minute limit. Eang kept speaking. Chau repeated what he said in Khmer. Eang kept speaking. Then Ron Peacetree (a Solidarity Lowell member) stood up in the back and yelled “He can have my time!” and Eang was able to finish his speech.

Solidarity Lowell member Joe Boyle followed Eang. “You would have been all over Cambodian state media, helping to disarm the Cambodian opposition,” Joe said while looking at Chau, “but, because of the actions taken by this body tonight, you won’t.”

Yun-Ju Choi, Executive Director of Coalition for a Better Acre, spoke next. She described traveling to Cambodia as part of a delegation with City Councilor Rita Mercier and then-City Councilor Rodney Elliot in 2015. She explained that back then she was new to Lowell and excited to learn about the culture here, but had no understanding of Cambodian politics. She went on to say that while in Cambodia she learned about what kind of government it has, and had a lot of regret for going on that trip. 

Another up-and-coming young politician, Justin Ford, who ran for City Council two years ago, continued the speeches. He explained how his father and other family members came to America to escape the killing fields and create a better life for themselves. “Mr. Mayor, … You should know the significance behind that motion. Say no to dictators!” (Cheers)

I was next. My speech was short, so I’ll copy it here: “Hun Sen is a brutal dictator who is attempting to destroy democracy in Cambodia. Many of Lowell’s Cambodian citizens have relatives who still live there, who are trapped and unable to speak freely. This motion only legitimizes that dictatorship. We cannot forge a friendship with any cities in Cambodia while Hun Sen is in power. Solidarity Lowell stands with the CNRP in their fight for democracy in Cambodia.”

There were no more speakers from the community, so at this point they moved on to hear the thoughts of the City Council members. 

Councilor Rita Mercier, the longest-serving member of the Council, kicked things off, with a defensive explanation of why she had gone to Cambodia with Yun-Ju Choi. She said she went to experience what her constituents feel, and see what they had experienced. She was not sorry for going because of all that she had learned. “We went to the refugee camps in Thailand, we went to Angkor Wat, we went to see a beautiful structure, wonder of the world…” she rambled. “I wouldn’t even want to tell you what I’ve been through, learning this,” she said of her trip, to actual victims of the killing fields. “The things that they did to the woman were just so atrocious that I think of it every now and then and it gives me the chills,” she said, to people who deal with these memories every day.

She went on to explain that she and the rest of the group from Lowell visited a prison where 13 women were unjustly locked up for wanting to keep their land when the government wanted to give it away. She said that when she returned to Lowell, she met with then-Congresswoman Nikki Tsongas, and Elliot met with Senator Elizabeth Warren, and they in turn met with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and in two weeks the women were released. 

Councilor Kim Scott spoke up next and suggested that the Council review the criteria that we use to create Sister Cities.

Councilor Vesna Nuon was next to speak on this motion. He recognized the many Cambodians who had lost loved ones to the Khmer Rouge. “I am really almost in tears myself when Bopha Peou spoke. I know she had that feeling and most of the people in this room too. It’s been 40-something years and that doesn’t go away. … Someday we will have a Sister City arrangement with Cambodia when they have a leader that do[es] respect human rights, free and fair elections, and the rule of law.”

Councilor Erik Gitschier followed with a speech straight out of middle school, starting with the dictionary definition of the word “democracy.” He thanked everyone who reached out to him and said that he learned a lot. He thanked the mayor for withdrawing the motion, but said, “I don’t know that we would have known any better had it not been put forward.” (Despite him having many Cambodians in his district.) “I learned a lot about Cambodia. Whether it’s true or not, I don’t have that background,” he added — a baffling statement. 

Councilor Corey Robinson went next, pointing out that normally when a Sister City is proposed, the people of that heritage are proud and excited. But that was not the case in this situation, and this motion was not fair for the residents of the city.

Councilor Wayne Jenness said that unlike any other motion he’s seen, every message he heard about this was unanimous. He made the motion then to request that the Rules Subcommittee meet to create policies around the Sister Cities relationships going forward. A voice vote was then taken and the motion carried.

Finally, Mayor Chau himself announced that he’d like to say a few words. “When I made the Sister City motion, it was intended to be good for Battambang and Lowell, not for politics or the government.” He pointed out that we already have Sister City agreements with many other cities, including Liberia and Russia. He claimed that in creating those relationships, none of the Councilors had thought about the political parties of the government or country. At the end of his speech, he spoke about the many amazing qualities of Battambang in a way that seemed straight out of a tourist brochure. He ended with, “Battambang has many delicious foods and fruit.” 

Boos echoed through the chamber.

Three Quick Actions to Take This Weekend

Here are three quick actions that you can take this weekend.

Ask of Gov. Healey: Pause New Gas Infrastructure

Happy Earth Day! The science has long been clear: we need to rapidly transition away from fossil fuels and toward renewable energy. If we know that there can be no long-term future for fossil fuel infrastructure, then we need to stop expanding it and creating a lock-in effect for decades to come, with negative health and environmental impacts on surrounding communities.

Governor Healey has spoken of climate as a top priority, so she should show that commitment by pledging to halt new gas system expansions until the state has a concrete plan for a just transition to a clean — and green — energy future.

Can you join Mass Power Forward in calling on her to do so?

Ask of Your State Senator: Protect Fair Share

The tax plans proposed by the Governor and the House include hundreds of millions of dollars in unnecessary giveaways to the ultra-rich and large corporations.

House Tax Proposal vs. Fair Share

But the Senate can take a different path.

Call your State Senator and ask them to:

✅ REJECT the proposed cut to the short-term capital gains tax that would overwhelmingly benefit wealthy investors;
✅REJECT expanding the ‘single sales factor apportionment’ that would give a massive tax break to large, profitable multi-state corporations;
✅TARGET any estate tax reform exclusively to moderate estates, with no tax breaks to large multi-million-dollar estates; AND
✅USE THOSE SAVINGS to invest in affordable housing, childcare, and reliable transportation.

Don’t know your State Senator’s phone number? Find it here, and then save it in your phone for next time.

And then after you make that call, can you follow up with an email?

And if you’re free this upcoming week, sign up for a phone bank with Raise Up Mass so that we can drive more calls to legislators.

  • Tuesday, April 25, 4 pm to 7 pm
  • Wednesday, April 26, 4 pm to 7 pm
  • Thursday, April 27, 4 pm to 7 pm

Ask of Your State Rep: Support No Cost Calls

The good news is that the MA House included No Cost Calls language — that is, ending the predatory practice of prisons and jails charging incarcerated individuals for phone calls to loved ones — in its FY2024 budget proposal.

However, there are additional steps necessary to strengthen the guarantee of access to such free phone calls. Rep. Chynah Tyler filed an amendment to the budget (Amendment #1559) to do just that, ensuring a stronger baseline of access (i.e., including access to tablets and setting a minimum guarantee for call time).

Can you call your state rep to ask them to support Amendment #1559 to the House budget?

Keeping Families Together: No Cost Calls. Rep Chynah Tyler, Amdt #1559

In solidarity,

Endorsement Alert: Rob Orthman for the 10th Suffolk

All elections are special, but some are more “special” than others. On Tuesday, May 2, voters in West Roxbury, part of Roslindale, and part of Jamaica Plain in Boston, as well as part of Brookline, will be going to the polls for a special election for state representative for the 10th Suffolk district, vacated by Rep. Ed Coppinger.

We invited all candidates running to submit candidate questionnaires, and you can find those that we received here.

Both of our chapters in the district — JP Progressives and Progressive West Roxbury/Roslindale — held forums, interviews, and endorsement votes, and both of them endorsed Rob Orthman for the 10th Suffolk.

Progressive Mass conducted our own member vote for the race, and we are proud to say that we will be joining our chapters in endorsing Rob Orthman for the 10th Suffolk.

Here is what some of our members said about Rob:

  • “Rob is an extremely smart, engaged person who has a huge depth of knowledge on policy. His experience negotiating with developers on expanding affordable housing and finding practical, low-cost ways to improve the T would be critical assets in the State House.”
  • “Rob has amazing depth in so many crucial policy areas, he’s been a courageous leader in this community already, and he’s been successful in supporting small businesses and bringing about change, including the dedicated bus lane and affordable housing. He addresses housing, climate, transit, early education access, and justice issues with urgency. Besides being bold and persistent, he’s also accessible and responsive.”
  • “Rob is a proven local leader who gets results for his district in housing affordability and transportation, the two desperately needed areas of leadership statewide. These issues are not only drastically important for Massachusetts with housing inflation and crumbling state transportation infrastructure, but intersect with nearly every issue facing Massachusetts residents, including climate change, cost of living, traffic, and sense of community.”

And here is what our chapters said:

JP Progressives:

The JP Progressives Steering Committee recommends the endorsement of Rob Orthman for the May 2 special election for the 10th Suffolk State Representative seat…We were inspired by Rob’s organizing work in the district to advance these policies, including a recent success mobilizing in Roslindale on a housing project that led to a substantial increase in the number of affordable units, and his advocacy work with Walk Up Roslindale, which led to the creation of the morning inbound bus lane on Washington Street between Roslindale Village and Forest Hills. ….Rob has secured endorsements from candidates and elected officials we have endorsed previously, including David Halbert (former candidate for City Council At Large), Ruthzee Louijeune (Boston City Councilor At Large), and, importantly, Sam Montaño, the other state representative representing Jamaica Plain and a staunch advocate for affordable housing.

Progressive WRox/Roz:

PWRR endorses Rob Orthman for his tireless community leadership in critical policy areas and his knowledge of how policies impact the daily lives of residents. Rob has experience throughout the district; he’s been a leader on housing, transportation, climate, and small business. Rob is a consistent and courageous voice for a more sustainable and equitable future — crucial for the multiple crises we face in our state. Many members noted that Rob is already a community leader, effective, tireless, and visionary, focused on local and regional challenges. Rob has professional experience in the statewide childcare affordability crisis, and is a Boston Public Schools graduate and parent committed to progressive education policy. He has deep knowledge of all the district’s communities from personal and professional experience, including constituent services when he was on Councilor Tobin’s staff.

Letter (Globe): Needs of the many outweigh the desires of a few

Written by Progressive WRoz/Roz member Nina Lev and published in the Boston Globe on April 19, 2023.

I am both puzzled and disappointed by the current budget talks on Beacon Hill. Much of the analysis pits the benefits of those who are struggling to meet their basic needs against those of our wealthiest residents (“House’s tax plan echoes Healey’s ‘competitiveness’ goals,” Metro, April 12). Why is it assumed that the only way to retain the wealthy is to give them a tax break?

Don’t these citizens already live in comfortable homes, send their children to good schools, and enjoy nice vacations? Wouldn’t their lives, like those of the rest of us, be enhanced by providing secure housing and great educational opportunities to all of the Commonwealth’s children? Like the rest of us, don’t they wantreliable transportation, environmentally sustainable infrastructure, public art, and glorious parks? Until we can fully fund all these priorities, shouldn’t we hold off on talking about refunds to the most fortunate?

Nina Lev

Roslindale

PM in the News: House sends $1.1 Bil tax bill to senate

John Budenas, “House sends $1.1 Bil tax relief bill to senate,” State House News Sevice, April 13, 2023.

The Progressive Massachusetts group zeroed in on the estate tax, short-term capital gains tax and single sales factor apportionment reforms collectively worth about $440 million as pressure points. During its lobby day earlier on Thursday, the organization slammed those measures as “regressive” and likely to blunt the impact of a newly voter-enacted surtax on high earners.

“Think of all that we could do with $440 million if instead we invested it in our public transit systems, in education, in child care, in climate resilience, in affordable housing, or in health care,” the group wrote in a handout from its event. “Indeed, tackling our housing crisis should be the #1 priority if legislators actually cared about the goals of ‘affordability’ and ‘competitiveness.’”