Testimony: DOC’s Policies Should Reflect Its Stated Mission

Thursday, October 16, 2025 

Chair Cronin, Chair Cahill, and Members of the Joint Committee on Public Safety: 

I am submitting testimony on behalf of Progressive Massachusetts. PM is a statewide, multi-issue, grassroots membership organization focused on fighting for policy that would make our Commonwealth more equitable, just, sustainable, and democratic. 

We urge you to give a favorable report to the bills from the Dignity and Freedom Platform

  • An Act to build restorative family and community connection (Visitation Bill) (S.1720/H.2591) 
  • An Act Relative to Medical and Elder Parole (S.1722/H.2693) 
  • An Act relative to human rights and improved outcomes for incarcerated people (Human Rights Bill) (S.1651/ H.2608)  
  • An Act creating an independent correctional oversight office to facilitate the recommendations of the Special Legislative Commission on Structural Racism in Correctional Facilities of the Commonwealth (REICI race data and oversight bill) (S.1725/H.2636)

The Department of Correction’s website states as its mission to provide “custody, care, and programming for those under our supervision to prepare them for safe and successful reentry into the community.” However, many existing practices run fully counter to such a stated goal. 

Visitation Bill (S.1720/H.2591)

In 2018, the DOC passed severe restrictions on visitation rights. These included limiting the number of individuals on a pre-approved visitor list and the number of times said list can be changed each year, creating a burdensome application for visitors, imposing strict dress codes, and limiting the number of individuals anyone can visit.

Visitation is crucial to the well-being of families, children, incarcerated individuals, and even prison employees. Research has shown that visitation is an effective strategy in reducing recidivism and thereby enhancing public safety. Children of incarcerated parents are less likely to be incarcerated themselves if they visit their incarcerated parents. Visits help incarcerated individuals maintain relationships in their outside community which makes re-entry into the community much more likely to be successful.

Given that visitation enhances public safety, reduces recidivism, and promotes rehabilitation, our prisons and jails should be fostering the maintenance and growth of positive bonds between incarcerated individuals and their friends, family, and broader community—not limiting these relationships.

Elder and Medical Parole  (S.1722/H.2693) 

Despite our comparatively low incarceration rate by US standards,, we are tied with New Hampshire for the highest proportion of incarcerated people over the age of 55 in the country, who experience significantly worse health outcomes than people outside of prison. 

Moreover, older incarcerated individuals are significantly less likely to cause harm when released from incarceration. We are warehousing people as they get older and sicker in ways that make no one safer. 

Moreover, one driver of our comparatively old prison population is that, in recent years, MA has reformed our criminal legal system and moved away from the mistakes of the past. But many Black and Brown people still carry the burden of unnecessarily harsh sentencing laws in the “war on drugs” era. 

Human Rights Bill (S.1651/ H.2608) 

Again, if the DOC understands that its mission is to prepare people for successful re-entry, then its practices and policies should be better oriented toward that goal. This bill recognizes that and would establish universal access to programming, education, and vocational training opportunities, as well as meaningful and productive out of cell time. If we want to cultivate a culture of respect and growth outside the walls, we need to cultivate that inside too. 

Independent Correctional Oversight (S.1725/H.2636)

The Special Legislative Commission on Structural Racism in Correctional Facilities of the Commonwealth documented what is widely known: that structural racism is rampant in our carceral system. A lack of transparency and accountability reinforces this and allows it to worsen. An independent oversight office is long overdue. 

Let’s recognize the value of rehabilitation and reentry and our align systems in support, rather than around creating new cycles of harm. 

Sincerely, 

Jonathan Cohn 

Policy Director 

Progressive Massachusetts 

Testimony: Let’s Build on Maternal Health Progress

Wednesday, October 15, 2025 

Chair Feeney, Chair Murphy, and Members of the Joint Committee on Financial Services: 

I am submitting testimony on behalf of Progressive Massachusetts. PM is a statewide, multi-issue, grassroots membership organization focused on fighting for policy that would make our Commonwealth more equitable, just, sustainable, and democratic. 

We urge you to give a favorable report to S.784/H.1117: An Act promoting and enhancing the sustainability of birth centers and the midwifery workforce. 

Recognizing the stark inequities in maternal health outcomes and the urgency of action, the Legislature passed essential maternal health legislation last session. These bills build on that work in strengthening our maternal health infrastructure. 

The Health Policy Commission and the Commission on Racial Inequities in Maternal Health, the Governor, and the Legislature have recognized midwifery as a key solution in improving maternal health outcomes, and Governor Healey and your chambers showed you agree last session through the 2024 law, which created new opportunities to open freestanding birth centers and become a licensed midwife in Massachusetts. 

S.784 and H.1117 promote financial sustainability for birth centers and the midwifery workforce needed for birth centers (as well as hospitals, homes, and other clinical settings). New birth centers will need stable funding and a sufficient midwife workforce to stay open, and training, education, and supports are needed for that workforce to exist. And both the centers and the workforce are necessary to provide new parents with access to reproductive care options. These bills recognize all of that and help create a robust health care system. 

Sincerely, 

Jonathan Cohn 

Policy Director 

Progressive Massachusetts 

Testimony: We Need to Scale Up Solar

Wednesday, October 15, 2025 

Chair Barrett, Chair Cusack, and Members of the Joint Committee on Telecommunications, Utilities, and Energy: 

I am submitting testimony on behalf of Progressive Massachusetts. PM is a statewide, multi-issue, grassroots membership organization focused on fighting for policy that would make our Commonwealth more equitable, just, sustainable, and democratic. 

We urge you to give a favorable report to H.3559/S.2296: An Act to Encourage Solar Development on Buildings and Disturbed Land.

Massachusetts has set important climate goals, but meeting those climate goals will require a far faster transition to clean and green energy. 

These bills would incentivize the siting of solar projects on buildings and disturbed lands, where doing so has the least environmental impact. We can scale up solar and protect our forests at the same time. 

What does this mean in practice? More solar installations on parking lot canopies, brownfields, and roadway cuts. More solar on rooftops of residential, commercial and industrial buildings.

The incentives that currently exist have been mainly targeted at the small-scale solar of a household but do not meet the needs of such larger installations. 

This bill would fuel the solar energy economy in Massachusetts, which will help us create jobs, reduce energy costs, and ensure a livable planet for all. 

As the federal government abandons its commitment to climate action and sabotages progress on environmental justice, it is up to states to lead the way. These bills would help us do so.

Sincerely, 

Jonathan Cohn 

Policy Director 

Progressive Massachusetts 

“Massachusetts Has a Higher GDP Than Sweden…”

Friday, October 3, 2025

Chair Eldridge, Chair Madaro, and Members of the Joint Committee on Revenue:

I am writing today on behalf of Progressive Massachusetts, a statewide, multi-issue, grassroots membership organization focused on fighting for policy that would make our Commonwealth more equitable, just, sustainable, and democratic. We urge you to give a favorable report to H.3110/S.2033: An Act combating offshore tax avoidance.

Massachusetts residents have been feeling hopeless this year in light of the never-ending barrage of chaos, cruelty, and corruption in the second Trump administration, and they are also looking to you in the State Legislature for leadership.

Fortunately, you have wide latitude for action. For example, although Trump and Congressional Republicans passed disastrous legislation this summer that could lead to up 350,000 people in MA losing health care, 104,000 losing access to food assistance, and harmful cuts to our schools, we do not need to accept these cuts as inevitable.  

Massachusetts has a higher GDP than the country of Sweden, a place known for its generous welfare state. It is clear that we can do more than we are, and we will need to in the coming years. These bills offer a sensible and popular way to raise additional revenue in order to prevent these looming cuts.

Massachusetts loses hundreds of millions of dollars each year to offshore corporate tax dodging — money that would otherwise support local families and communities here in Massachusetts. That’s because billionaire global corporations like Apple, Amazon, McDonald’s, and Walmart conceal their profits in offshore tax havens to avoid paying their fair share in Massachusetts taxes. These bills would ensure that such corporations pay our state’s corporate income tax on a greater share of these offshored profits, raising essential new revenue. They would correct the grave error when Massachusetts chose to leave this revenue on the table several sessions ago as a result of backroom negotiations and no public discussion.

Let’s do right by the name of “Commonwealth” that our state has and ensure that we are fighting for the common good of all when that is under attack each day. Your constituents depend on it.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Cohn

Policy Director

Progressive Massachusetts

Overdose Prevention Centers Work. Let’s Embrace Them.

Tuesday, September 23, 2025

Dear Chair Velis, Chair Domb, and Members of the Joint Committee on Mental Health, Substance Use, and Recovery:

I am writing today on behalf of Progressive Massachusetts, a statewide, multi-issue, grassroots membership organization focused on fighting for policy that would make our Commonwealth more equitable, just, sustainable, and democratic. We urge you to give a favorable report to H.2196/S.1393: An Act relative to preventing overdose deaths and increasing access to treatment.

Overdose prevention centers are a proven harm reduction strategy that should be part of our state and local response to the opioid crisis.

This success at reducing overdose deaths should come as no surprise: by providing a safe, stigma-free space, OPCs create an opportunity for individuals suffering from addiction to connect with health care providers and begin their road to recovery. They also benefit the surrounding communities by moving drug use indoors and decreasing public disturbances. By contrast, the criminalization of addiction and poverty has repeatedly made communities less safe and less healthy

Communities in Massachusetts are learning from other states and other countries that have legalized overdose prevention centers, but they need a clear regulatory framework to move forward. These bills would allow the Department of Public Health to regulate these centers and offer legal protections for staff, clients, and operators of DPH approved programs.

Our neighbors in New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont have already embraced OPCs as a part of a comprehensive response to the opioid crisis. Let’s join them.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Cohn

Policy Director

Progressive Massachusetts

Raising the Age is Good for Safety, Good for the Economy, and Good for Our Future

Tuesday, September 23, 2025

Chair Edwards, Chair Day, and Members of the Joint Committee on the Judiciary:

Progressive Massachusetts is a statewide, multi-issue, grassroots membership organization focused on fighting for policy that would make our Commonwealth more equitable, just, sustainable, and democratic. We urge you to give a favorable report to S.1061: An Act to Promote Public Safety and Better Outcomes for Young Adults.

A decade ago, Massachusetts raised the age of juvenile court to keep 17-year-olds out of the adult system. Supporters of this reform argued that keeping young people out of the adult criminal system would reduce recidivism. The data is in: they were right. Juvenile crime has declined, and Massachusetts has seen faster declines in violent and property crime rates than the national average. 

It’s time to build on that success by raising the age to 21, as this bill would do. Young people are highly influenced by their environments: it is no surprise then that adult jail and prison environments increase offending behavior. By contrast, in the juvenile system, adolescents have better access to educational and mental health resources that are critical to rehabilitation and successful re-entry, as well as stricter supervision.

Mass incarceration policies have hit communities of color in Massachusetts especially hard. As a criminal sentence too often closes off educational and employment opportunities, our criminal legal system perpetuates racial inequalities. A focus on rehabilitation would give youth a better chance to grow up and contribute in their community and, by doing so, would help reduce intergenerational poverty. When our criminal legal system centers human dignity, rehabilitation, and accountability, rather than punishment and vengeance, we are all safer and healthier in the long run.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Cohn

Policy Director

Progressive Massachusetts

Let’s Lift Our Kids out of Deep Poverty

Monday, September 22, 2025

Chair Kennedy, Chair Livingstone, and Members of the Joint Committee on Children, Families, and Persons with Disabilities:

Progressive Massachusetts is a statewide, multi-issue, grassroots membership organization focused on fighting for policy that would make our Commonwealth more equitable, just, sustainable, and democratic. We urge you to give a favorable report to H. 214 and S. 118: An Act to lift kids out of deep poverty.

These bills would raise cash assistance grants by 20% a year until they reach 50% of the federal poverty level (FPL), and then adjust them annually so that they remain at 50% FPL and do not lose their value over time.

We appreciate the Legislature’s commitment to addressing deep poverty. The Committee favorably reported prior versions of these bills in three previous legislative sessions and included increases to cash assistance grants in the last five budget cycles, from FY21 to FY25.

However, the question of whether to raise cash assistance grants should not need to be revisited every year.  Instead, as the bills provide, grants should be increased more rapidly to reach the modest Deep Poverty level and then increased each year to keep up with increases in the cost of living.

The current maximum TAFDC grant of $861 a month for a family of three with no income is still less than half of the federal poverty level—Deep Poverty—currently $1,110 a month. Grant amounts for EAEDC cash assistance for older adults and people with disabilities are even lower, at only $441 a month for an individual, compared to the Deep Poverty level of $652 a month. With grant amounts this low, families cannot afford basic necessities, forced to decide whether they can afford food or medications or a roof over their head.

Please give your full support to these bills. It is time to end Deep Poverty in Massachusetts.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Cohn

Policy Director

Progressive Massachusetts

An Inclusive Education is a Quality Education

Tuesday, September 16, 2025

Chair Lewis, Chair Gordon, and Members of the Joint Committee on Education:

My name is Jonathan Cohn, and I am the Policy Director of Progressive Massachusetts, a statewide grassroots advocacy group committed to fighting for an equitable, just, democratic, and sustainable Commonwealth.

We urge you to give a favorable report to S.371/H.655: An Act to promote comprehensive and inclusive curriculum in schools and S.340/H.656: An Act relative to healthy youth. 

In recent years, we have seen an attack from organized conservative forces on the teaching of US history, fueled by a desire to whitewash history and erase the contributions of women, people of color, and LGBTQ communities. The Trump administration has been doubling down on this with a multi-front attack on public education and civil rights with the Orwellian term of “patriotic education.” 

Students benefit from learning the entirety of history, not sanitized versions of it, and they benefit from seeing themselves represented in the materials taught in the classroom. We should be ensuring that students receive an inclusive, comprehensive, anti-racist curriculum that will set them up for success. 

S.371/H.655 would require that the state’s academic standards include the achievements, contributions, and other works in the humanities, science, math, literature, arts, and other disciplines by people from underrepresented groups; and the accurate heritage, customs, and identities of underrepresented groups, including the histories of slavery, colonial settlement, land appropriation, territorial expansion, tribal reservations, and present-day effects of such pasts. All our students benefit from such a fuller understanding of history and culture. 


S.340/H.656 (“The Healthy Youth Act”) would expand the reach and positive impact of the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education’s Comprehensive Health and Physical Education Framework, which includes updated standards for sex education and was unanimously approved by the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education in 2023. This new Framework is a significant step forward, but the Healthy Youth Act is still needed to ensure that the sex education students receive in school is medically accurate, age appropriate, and LGBTQ-inclusive. It is disappointing and shocking that MA is behind many other states in this regard. We should be leading, not playing catch up, when it comes to basic education.  

Sincerely,

Jonathan Cohn

Policy Director

Progressive Massachusetts

We Can Mitigate Voter Confusion with Good Policy.

Chair Keenan, Chair Hunt, and Members of the Joint Committee on Election Laws:

My name is Jonathan Cohn, and I am the Policy Director of Progressive Massachusetts, a statewide grassroots advocacy group committed to fighting for an equitable, just, democratic, and sustainable Commonwealth.

We urge you to give a favorable report to the following bills:

  • H.834 / S.505: An Act establishing same day registration of voters
  • H.799 / S.503: An Act decoupling the municipal census from voter registration
  • H.820 / S.504: An Act enforcing accessibility for voters with disabilities
  • H.874 / S.524: An Act relative to voting rights restoration

Critical to improving voting access is reducing opportunities for voter confusion. Voters have so much to think about as they decide whom to vote for. But there are ample opportunities to be confused about such questions as “Am I able to vote?” “Where?” “When?” “If I go there, will my vote be counted?”—to name a few—given the many questions and problems that plague people every day of their lives. We can mitigate all of these sources of confusion with good policy.

Same Day Registration (H.834/S.505)

Tenants moving to a new apartment after getting priced out or evicted by an unscrupulous landlord. Senior citizens looking to downsize and move into a retirement community. Under MA’s current law, if these moves happen too close to an election date, these people—and countless others like them—could lose their right to vote.

That’s because we have an arbitrary and unjust 10-day voter registration cutoff. And shockingly, we’re an outlier in New England for having a cutoff at all. In Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, and Connecticut, eligible voters can register to vote or update their registration at the polls. It’s a simple reform (indeed, NH and ME have done it for decades), and it can boost engagement and improve the efficiency of election administration.

The need for Same Day Registration will be especially acute next year, as the state primary is currently scheduled for September 1, a major move-in day across the state. And, indeed, as you all know from running for office, most voters start paying attention in those final weeks, and they shouldn’t be shut out of the process for doing so.

Decoupling the Municipal Census from Voter Registration (H.799/S.503)

Our municipal censuses serve valuable roles for data collection and jury selection, but MA is an outlier in making them a tool for voter disenfranchisement. Voters can be rendered inactive for failing to complete a form that many can easily miss, creating confusion at the polls and increasing barriers to participation.

Disability Access (H.820/S.504)

Voting must be accessible to all eligible citizens, including voters with disabilities. In reality, too many polling places still have barriers to full inclusion: malfunctioning accessible machines, poor signage, broken automatic doors, and more. These bills provide meaningful oversight by requiring polling place inspections every four years, compliance plans for sites that fall short, and enforcement authority for the Attorney General.

Voting Rights Restoration (H.874 / S.524)

Felony disenfranchisement in Massachusetts is a recent phenomenon. Indeed, although we often think of the history of voting rights in the US as one of ever-forward motion, Massachusetts stands as an outlier. In the late 1990s, after incarcerated individuals in MCI-Norfolk started organizing for better conditions, Republican Governor Bill Cellucci and the MA Legislature responded with retaliation: a multi-step process of disenfranchisement. In 2000, Massachusetts voters approved a constitutional amendment to prohibit people incarcerated for felonies in state prison from voting in state elections; the subsequent year, Cellucci signed a law to extend this prohibition to federal and municipal elections. Our commonwealth did something rare in recent history: it took away the right to vote from a category of people who were formerly enfranchised.

In 2022, the Massachusetts Legislature took an important step forward when passing the VOTES Act by including language creating protections for jail-based voting for those who still maintain the right to vote, but we must build on that momentum by ending remaining disenfranchisement, as these bills would.

To go back to the point about voter confusion, this connection between incarceration and voting rights can often lead people to think they have lost their right to vote permanently, even when they return home. Again, voter confusion leads to disenfranchisement, and it is preventable with good policy.

In Conclusion, at a time when democracy is under attack, MA should be taking every step we can to strengthen our democracy. Let’s show our commitment to democracy and improve the voting experience for everyone.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Cohn

Policy Director

Progressive Massachusetts

Real Estate Transfer Fees Are a Critical Tool for Addressing Our Housing Crisis

Tuesday, September 9, 2025

Chair Eldridge, Chair Madaro, and Members of the Joint Committee on Revenue:

I am writing on behalf of Progressive Massachusetts, a statewide, member-based grassroots advocacy organization fighting for a more equitable, just, sustainable, and democratic Commonwealth.

We urge you to give a favorable report to S.1937/H.3056: An Act granting a local option for a real estate transfer fee to fund affordable housing, filed by Sen. Jo Comerford and Reps. Mike Connolly and Carmine Gentile.

Massachusetts has a housing crisis. We see it in every survey of top issues among residents. We see it in the rising home prices and the number of communities where the median home sale has passed $1 million. We see it in the way that growth in rents has outpaced growth in wages. And we see it in the number of young families or long-term residents who decide to move out of state because they simply can’t afford the high cost of housing in Massachusetts.

Our cities and towns need every tool in the toolbox to address our state’s housing crisis, and a real estate transfer fee would provide a crucial one. By imposing a small fee on high-end real estate transactions, communities will be able to provide much-needed funding to affordable housing trusts so that we can preserve and expand affordable housing stock. These bills recognize that each community’s housing situation is different and thus enable cities and towns to craft the proposal that best fits their community’s needs.

Cities and towns from across the Commonwealth have already filed home rule petitions to do this. When our cities and towns want to become places where people can afford to live at every stage of life, the State Legislature should support them, not get in the way.

Thank you for your work on the hearing, and again we urge a favorable report on S.1937 and H.3056.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Cohn

Policy Director

Progressive Massachusetts